Topics

Archives

40-Man, Player by Player: John Jaso

by ~ March 17th, 2012 at 8:00 am

Without really crowdsourcing at all, I would imagine that a majority of tuned in Mariner fans were pleased with the John Jaso trade. As the M’s and their supporters are all too aware, finding a decent big league catcher isn’t easy, and the acquisition came with the added bonus of sending Josh Lueke out the door.

If there was any facet of the deal that made fans pause, it was the ease in which Jaso was acquired. We’re talking about a catcher who posted a 116 wRC+ in 2010 and has four years of team control left on his contract. Why did the Rays give him away for a marginally effective reliever with a well documented off field history?

The easy answer is that the Rays simply didn’t think Jaso was going to be effective going forward. Jaso was dealt to the M’s on November 27th, and considering that Jose Molina signed a deal with the club one day later, I’ll just go ahead and assume that they weighed the pros and cons of each and went with Molina. As to why the Rays opted for a career backup over a guy like Jaso who should, at least in theory, be in his prime, I think there were three main reasons.

First, Jaso’s defense isn’t very good. Catcher defense is difficult to quantify, but from what research has been done, Jaso doesn’t stack up well with the competition and he compares particularly poorly with Molina. Molina is one of the best in the business at throwing out runners (40% caught stealing rate for his career) while Jaso’s meager 19% CS rate doesn’t really deter anyone from trying to take an extra base.

Additionally, saberist Mike Fast (now employed by the Houston Astros) has done some research on pitch framing, and while defensive numbers should always be viewed with a hefty dose of skepticism, he found that Molina was the best in baseball at framing pitches. By contrast, Jaso was a below average receiver. If Fast’s estimates are correct, Molina is more than a win better than Jaso due to pitch framing alone.

Second, Jaso was never an impact prospect, and his major league breakout was something of a surprise. The Rays have a reputation for moving players through their farm system slowly, but Jaso’s pace through the minors was glacial. He was only an eighth round pick, but even the low picks that reach the majors tend to show their skills early and are promoted quickly. Jaso spent six and a half seasons in the minors before getting called up for good in 2010 and he repeated a level on three separate occasions. His minor league career is a lesson in perseverance but also serves as an indication that the Rays never thought terribly highly of him as a major league catcher. I’m not saying the Rays are right or wrong about Jaso: only that a quick review of his career suggests that the Tampa Bay brass still haven’t bought into his breakout from two years ago.

Finally, the biggest reason Jaso was available on the cheap is because he had a lousy year in 2011. Oftentimes a poor season  is a great buy-low opportunity, particularly when a player’s performance is hindered by injuries or extenuating circumstances, or when his peripherals suggest a rebound is likely. None of those appear to be at play with Jaso. Yes, he did visit the disabled list with an oblique strain, but he was already well on his way to a bad year at the plate when he went down in July.

Worse, a glance at Jaso’s peripherals indicate some concerning trends. A calling card of Jaso’s game is his selectivity at the plate: he walked in nearly 15% of his plate appearances in 2010 and that figure is backed by several similar percentages when he was a minor leaguer. He complemented his ability to take a walk with good bat control: he only struck out in 9% of his PA’s in 2010, and again, posted similar minor league figures. Those numbers flipped in 2011. In and of itself, that kind of a switch in both BB% and K% is unusual. For Jaso, it’s also unfortunate, because without any power, he needs to walk and give himself plenty of chances to get on via a base hit. Less walks and more strikeouts defeat both both objectives. And while it’s true that his numbers in 2011 were deflated by a lousy BABIP, a slow catcher who hits a lot of ground balls is a bad candidate to post a high figure in that department going forward.

Ultimately, Jaso seems more like a very good backup catcher and decent pinch hitter than a big league starter. In addition to his struggles last year, he’s neutered by lefties (.188 career batting average) and at age twenty-eight isn’t likely to get a whole lot better. That doesn’t mean he wasn’t worth acquiring: not by a longshot. He does hit righties pretty well (career 104 wRC+) and his defense is probably a little better than what Miguel Olivo and Jesus Montero can provide. If Jaso can prove that 2010 was no fluke, and that he can be a solid big league regular, Jack Z will have swindled another victim. But even if Jaso doesn’t have that kind of projection, he still can be effective in a platoon, and his bat off the bench can pay dividends for years to come.


  • http://twitter.com/95MiracleMs Lance Miller

    With KC’s catcher going down, do you think M’s are talking to them about one of their catchers not named Montero? I think KC would be a great fit for Moore if he wasn’t hurt. 

    • http://twitter.com/bgawtheidahofan Brendan Gawlowski

      Olivo’s actually a decent fit for Kansas City. He’s a veteran, he only has one year on his contract, and on the off chance that the Royals get off to a fast start, they are probably going to want to have an experienced catcher on the roster. Whether they want Olivo specifically is anybody’s guess. 

      I don’t think Moore fits all that well, actually. It’s a bad move for Moore’s future, as he essentially would be relegated to a role as a backup until his contract runs out. Moreover, if KC is looking for a fill in catcher for a few months, they probably want someone with a clean bill of health, something Moore can’t offer. 

      • http://twitter.com/95MiracleMs Lance Miller

         Agreed about Moore which is why I mentioned ‘if he wasn’t hurt’. If he was healthy, I think a move to KC would have been good for him. If he couldn’t beat out the two current catchers there, he wouldn’t seem to have much of a MLB future anyways. No matter since he is hurt and probably will be released at some point even if he goes on the DL to buy time.

        • http://twitter.com/bgawtheidahofan Brendan Gawlowski

          He’d have really struggled to beat out Salvador Perez. Perez had an excellent quarter season for them last year and the team signed him to a five year deal, which is extremely unusual for a player with such little MLS time. 

    • Anonymous

      With Moore’s injury, don’t we now essentially need all 3 catchers that we have now–Jaso, Montero, and Olivo?

      Heck, even without Moore’s injury, couldn’t we essentially say the same, since Montero is going to be the regular DH and just a part-time catcher?  If you trade Olivo and only carry Jaso and Montero, what happens if Jaso gets hurt in a game(early in the season) that he is the starting catcher in and Montero moves to catcher from DH?  Well, tough, you lose the DH then.  And then, Jaso goes on the DL, Moore’s still injured, and you have Montero and…who else as your 2nd catcher?

      At least wait until Moore has returned from the DL and rehabbed/played at Tacoma for a month or two before trading anyone–preferrably, Olivo.  ;)

  • Anonymous

    Taken in isolation this deal looks good. I’m sure the team sees trading Leuke as partly addition by subtraction since they’d rather not have to explain playing a guy with his background. But in terms of the organization it fails to fill a basic need: a good defensive catcher.

    In fact none of the deals the team has made for a catcher over the last two years have improved defense at the position which, since Rob Johnson was made the starter, has been awful. That’s why they shouldn’t give up on Moore. After this season, if Moore plays well he and Jaso could very likely end up sharing the job with Montero a permanent DH. Or Moore and Montero. Or Jaso and Montero. Or all three! But I don’t see Olivo sticking around with his inability to hit so the M’s should keep all their options open.

    • http://twitter.com/95MiracleMs Lance Miller

       Other option is they use the 3rd pick on Zunino from Florida who most people feel they might. He is considered one of the better defensive catchers in college and he hits for good measure.

  • Anonymous

    I agree beer not war is the answer and that Moore might be too, if he can get and stay healthy.  Jaso for Leuke was not a great trade for me, Jaso is not much and Leuke could be.  It works only because Moore got hurt and he doesn’t look bad behind the dish compared to Olivo and Montero.  Just my opinion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000326149414 Jim Labruno

    Zunino is a beast. Many compare him to the next Mike Napoli. He hits for a ton and can catch to boot